On 19.5.2007, at 20.28, Charles Marcus wrote:

Timo Sirainen wrote:
I've been meaning to switch away from CVS for a few years now, but I was never sure what I wanted to switch to, so I kept delaying it. I finally
decided yesterday that Mercurial is pretty nice.

Hi Timo,

Not complaining or anything, but I'm curious... what is it about Mercurial that you like better than Subversion - which is what pretty much every other project changes to if they change from CVS?

SVN is centralized, Mercurial is distributed. Distributed version control systems allow a lot of nice things.

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to