On 19.5.2007, at 20.28, Charles Marcus wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:I've been meaning to switch away from CVS for a few years now, but I was never sure what I wanted to switch to, so I kept delaying it. I finallydecided yesterday that Mercurial is pretty nice.Hi Timo,Not complaining or anything, but I'm curious... what is it about Mercurial that you like better than Subversion - which is what pretty much every other project changes to if they change from CVS?
SVN is centralized, Mercurial is distributed. Distributed version control systems allow a lot of nice things.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
