On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 11:01 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote: > > No, that setting doesn't do anything for IMAP. Also none of those > > settings affect the "unknown user" error, so maybe 0.99 is somehow > > lucky > > in not generating those. Perhaps setting blocking=yes to userdb passwd > > args would help. > > > > Perhaps dovecot communicates with PAM in a different way from 0.99 to > 1.0.2? I don't know how else to explain it. Literally, the only time > I've gotten a report of Outlook's 'IMAP server disconnected' message > since the downgrade is when a user who was on a remote VPN connection > left Outlook open and let his computer go into hibernation for like > an hour. I'd expect dovecot to close that connection in that instance.
So you're using PAM + nss_ldap. I guess that can easily be the problem. http://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/Passwd
Description: This is a digitally signed message part