At 8:16 AM -0600 9/26/07, Chris Tirpak wrote:
 I have just confirmed with a direct test that Dovecot 1.0.0 using
 Maildir does properly service 2 simultaneous IDLE sessions on the
 INBOX. I've got my Palm ChatterEmail client logged in and idling and
 have a manual IMAP session (telnet localhost 143...) and the messages
 are popping up on the Palm in lockstep with the 'EXISTS' messages
 kicking out on the telnet session. Meanwhile, Eudora is doing its
 things from my Mac against the same mailbox (actually tossing
 messages out of INBOX to other folders) and I'm pretty sure I left
 Outlook running on my office machine and looking at the same mailbox,
 so whatever flaky stuff it does is happening on whatever schedule it
 uses as well...

Thanks. I have been using the same setup as you with no problems on my
existing server and loved it but have to say that the future of
Chatter looks questionable and my BB's get much better voice and
battery.

I saw the purchase of Chatter by Palm early this year as a positive sign. After all, VersaMail is such a piece of junk and they really needed something to answer Blackberry and the Windows Mobile push approach.

As for battery life, I can attest to my Treo 650 running an IDLE session being only a semi-portable device, particularly if I have the BT radio on as well. I don't know how well the Blackberries do, but it doesn't surprise me that they do better. I also can't recommend that anyone with metered data usage use the Chatter IDLE route, since that means a full-time data connection.


 Note that one strong consideration for IMAP servers with more than a
 handful of users is going to be dealing with the high concurrency of
 a lot of eternal connections from the Blackberry server and from
 other clients latched onto the same mailboxes. I suspect that one
 reason some systems limit concurrent sessions  is that they don't
 have (or haven't be configured to use) efficient filesystem event
 monitoring, and the alternatives are quite burdensome. In the case of
 Courier, it looks like it still relies on SGI's FAM, an abandoned
 project that doesn't really work well anywhere but Irix and Linux.
 Dovecot has avoided that at the cost of having to understand each
 system's unique approach to that issue.


Thanks for the insight.

--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to