On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 16:38 +0100, Edgar Fuß wrote: > Just to know: is there simply no interest in libwrap-ing dovecot or is > there a better way to do it or is my patch considered inadequate?
I also wrote libwrap patch a few years ago: http://dovecot.org/patches/1.0/tcp-wrappers.patch The problem is that it doesn't work when login process is chrooted, so I thought there's no point in including support for it. I was thinking about adding support for this in Dovecot v2.0 using some kind of a separate non-chrooted daemon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
