On Jan 8, 2008 7:31 AM, Bill Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 6:52 AM -0500 1/8/08, Charles Marcus wrote: > >Andrew Falanga, on 1/7/2008 11:18 PM, said the following: > >>What must be done to make sendmail do its thing for deliver? > > > >I don't think its because anyone is snubbing you... ;) > > > >I think one of the reasons is not as many people use sendmail > >anymore - I wouldn't have a clue... sorry... > > I think it is more a matter of this sounding very much like strictly > a Sendmail problem posed in the wrong forum for Sendmail problems, > further weakened by the inclusion of no details about the specific > nature of the problem or the existing configuration. A well-posed > question (e.g. with log and config info) to a more suitable forum > (e.g. comp.mail.sendmail) would almost surely get more response.
Ok, that's constructive. If I'm not posting enough data, please tell me. I'll get you what you need. I thought I was being quite verbose (please see some of the other posts too), but if the information isn't enough I need to know. Silence doesn't help anyone. > > > > To some degree it probably also involves the fact that the Dovecot > LDA is still something of a novelty, and it not as widely used as the > traffic on this list might lead one to believe. The Dovecot LDA does > not provide enough of a compelling feature set to overpower the > inertia of sticking with the standard delivery agent(s). That's not > specific to Sendmail. > I didn't realize this. With the wiki page on how to set it up, I figured that I should be using this. > > -- > Bill Cole > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Andy -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
