On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 09:35 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 09:28 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > I'm way behind the times. > > > > http://www.faqs.org/rfc/rfc3749.txt > > > > > > Looking at OpenSSL code, I think the patch below will give 0.9.8 ability > > > to support deflate compression. I'm not sure if I should include that to > > > Dovecot though. At least not for v1.1. :) > > > > > > diff -r 68a0be847980 src/login-common/ssl-proxy-openssl.c > > > --- a/src/login-common/ssl-proxy-openssl.c Fri Jun 20 12:20:17 2008 > > > +0300 > > > +++ b/src/login-common/ssl-proxy-openssl.c Sat Jun 21 04:29:51 2008 > > > +0300 > > > @@ -719,6 +719,7 @@ > > > ssl_clean_free); > > > SSL_library_init(); > > > SSL_load_error_strings(); > > > + (void)SSL_COMP_get_compression_methods(); > > > > > > extdata_index = SSL_get_ex_new_index(0, dovecot, NULL, NULL, > > > NULL); > > > > Huh? As far as I can tell that will just return NULL and have no side > > effects because you haven't previously added compression methods > > with SSL_COMP_add_compression_method. > > However, digging deeper,
and yet more, Thunderbird doesn't seem to support it: http://mxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/security/nss/lib/ssl/ssl3con.c Neither does evolution, I think, since it too uses libnss. johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
