Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/23/2008, Luca Corti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It fails on random files, since the system is running a few daemons
without any problem I'd go for the gcc bug.
Actually, failing at random point when compiling is *much* more likely
to be a memory error.
If the 'few daemons' don't happen to ever hit the bad ram, that would
explain why they don't fail.
Just try replacing the RAM (RAM is chep nowadays), and see if it fixes
the problem.
or test with memtest (if x86):
http://www.memtest.org/
hth
Philipp
