On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 09:25 +0200, Joseba Torre wrote: > El Martes, 1 de Julio de 2008 a las 19:42, Timo Sirainen escribió: > > These are actually all normal. I just haven't bothered to fix imaptest > > to treat different users' mailboxes as actual separate mailboxes. Since > > it assumes all the mailboxes are the one and same, it sees a lot of > > problems because they aren't. The multiuser support was written long > > before I added these checks and I haven't needed the multiuser testing > > myself for a long time, so this is broken for now. Feel free to fix > > it. :) > > Ok, thanks for the explanation. Unfortunately, my coding skills are far from > optimal :)
Well, there's also an easy solution: ./imaptest 2>/dev/null :) > > Also have you seen http://imapwiki.org/Benchmarking? imaptest tests best > > the webmail kind of a performance but not that much of > > Outlook/Thunderbird performance. > > Yes, i've read it. Our server load raised quite a lot since we switched our > webmail from caching postman (http://www.uv.es/postman/postman.html) to > non-caching imp, so non-caching tests are more important for us. Be sure to use sort=100 parameter then also to test sorting performance that's a lot better with v1.1.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
