On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 12:55 -0400, John Wells wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 12:37 -0400, John Wells wrote: > >> Guys, > >> > >> We have a very large maildir for email auditing purposes. It's > >> currently at 600 GB and continues to grow. > >> > >> Can dovecot handle this with squat indexing, or am I out of my mind? > > > > You can try of course, but that might be a bit too much. :) I've only > > tested with a 1,4 GB mailbox and memory usage went somewhere like 700 MB > > I think. > > Aha...I see...I was under the mistake impression that this was a > disk-based index.
It's stored on disk, but when indexing it needs to keep parts of the index in memory. > Given that squat seem unfeasible, can anyone recommend another > approach? I'll look at Lucene integration, but if anyone knows of a > dovecot way or of another tool that would do this effectively, > commercial or open source, please let me know. v1.1.2 has Solr support. It might work: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
