On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 12:13 -0300, Sebastien Tandel wrote: > Hi Timo, > > On 14 Aug 2008, at 17:04, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > > On Aug 14, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Giorgenes Gelatti wrote: > > > >> I've been studying dovecot for replacing my company's current system > >> and I got a little worried about an aspect of the dovecot's design. > >> I was surprised that dovecot doesn't use prefork for its mail > >> processes, forking a new processes for each new client connection. > > > > Login processes are preforked and they can also be configured to > > keep reusing existing processes. But yes, post-login imap/pop3 > > processes aren't preforked because it would require a larger > > redesign of the master process. Which is actually what I have been > > planning on doing for v2.0 for a long time now. > > Do you have pointer(s) to some mails / wiki pages talking about your > ideas of implementation of pre-forked process pool?
No. The plans are still pretty vague.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
