On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 17:00 -0600, Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez wrote: > Timo Sirainen escribió: > > On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 16:10 -0600, Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez wrote: > >> He argues that he has some other POP3 and IMAP4 accounts configured in > >> the same app, and those accounts never go "offline" even if the bw usage > >> is at 100% (those other accounts are not on my servers and I don't know > >> which sw are they using). My question is, could dovecot be somehow > >> involved in this "offline" issue? (something like the past IDLE issues > >> with Outlook 2007?) > > > > So the problem is higher latency I suppose? Dovecot's logins fail after > > idling for 3 minutes. I don't think the latencies should be that high no > > matter what you do with your bandwidth. Of course it's possible that > > there's something else than Dovecot that kills high-latency connections > > too soon (firewall, whatever). > > > Thanks for the answer Timo. No, his latency is not so high, and > moreover, I guess something is logged when this situation happens, > right? Nothing appears in the logs...
If Dovecot doesn't log even a login attempt, then yeah, I don't see how this could have anything to do with Dovecot or probably even your side of the server/network.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
