On Friday 15 January 2010 14:44:07 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > On Sex, 15 Jan 2010, Kārlis Repsons wrote: > > On Friday 15 January 2010 12:20:05 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > >> On Sex, 15 Jan 2010, Kārlis Repsons wrote: > >> > is there some easy way to inform Dovecot about a new delivery, which > >> > has happened after postfix invoked maildrop, so the index files would > >> > be updated? > >> > >> That's exactly the task for which dovecot deliver was made. > > > > But maybe you could also post a short info on how should deliver be > > called? > > > > I read that "The Dovecot LDA, called deliver, is a local delivery agent > > which takes mail from an MTA and delivers it to a user's mailbox, while > > keeping Dovecot index files up to date." > > However in my case maildrop seems to be in the place of deliver. > > Would it work > > if maildrop had deliver called by xfilter with the options appended, then > > followed by "to /dev/null"? > > I don't know maildrop, so I can't tell if this would work. But the > idea is to use deliver instead of maildrop, unless you need something > that only maildrop can do. > > In this case, I'd leave things as they are and not worry about > indexes. When the mail folder is opened next time dovecot will notice > the new messages and update the indexes.
But I think, client MUA will not be timely notified of the new mail, which might happen for one together with index updating (wouldn't it?)...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
