On 2010-02-19 3:16 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Charles Marcus wrote: >> On 2010-02-18 11:09 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: >>> Actually, I once had a system where the request was "we do not >>> send over quota notices, all mails have to arrive". Hence, >>> deliver should have no quota - well, a very high quota actually >>> -, but a quite strick IMAP quota.
>> So simply leaving everything in the INBOX defeats the quota? > Not directly. > > Incoming mails were spooled to /var/mail/user. Upon login via IMAP or > POP and when /var/mail/user changes those mails were slurped into > ~user/<<don't remember>> by the imap/pop server process. Ahh... so, this would only be a [potential] problem in the case of [a] user[s] that didn't login for a long time... and I guess you could even deal with that by some kind of nightly cron job... -- Best regards, Charles
