Charles Marcus put forth on 6/16/2010 7:18 AM: > On 2010-06-16 7:56 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> For this last minor bug, I was a one percenter, had the right >> combination--slow hardware plus mbox storage and full text >> searches on very large mbox files. > > Right, now I remember... > > So, its working well for you now I presume (since you're still here)?
Has been since 1.2.11 and even more so since Timo suggested I try mbox_very_dirty_syncs. That made a huge difference WRT the 10k+ mboxen, not search specifically, but just general access after new mail arrival, etc. 1.0.15 worked well also. It was just 1.2.10 that caused problems. -- Stan
