On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 21:32 -0400, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Timo Sirainen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'd think that with SSD mdbox would make less sense, since fragmentation > > isn't so much of a problem with SSDs. I've no benchmarks, but I wouldn't be > > surprised if sdbox performance was faster. In any case mdbox requires an > > extra index file that sdbox doesn't, which also increases disk writes. > > > > I didn't realize that sdbox would be faster in that scenario. Maybe > this has already been covered but is mdbox generally slower than sdbox > or is that just in this scenario. Thanks for your response.
I'm not saying that sdbox is definitely faster there. It might be. It might not be. I don't know. Would be nice if someone used both in production and showed some benchmarks. :)
