On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 14:58 -0300, Christian Lyra wrote: > The problem is with the "something" else. I´m using port 3268 to > connect to AD. I used ldapsearch to reproduce the problem, and found > that if I use port 389 the quotaMail shows up, but using port 3268 it > didnt. I guess that there was a good reason to use port 3268 instead > of 389, or not? Should I just change ports or try to fix AD (i mean, > persuade the AD admin to fix it)?
The reason why 3268 port was suggested was because some people said that 389 didn't work. I updated the wiki LDAP page now to say: When connecting to AD, you may need to use port 3268. Then again, not all LDAP fields are available in port 3268. Use whatever works.
