On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 17:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:

> And thanks for not (yet) making it reject the invalid command with the
> 1:* in it 

I changed it in v2.0.

> -- I'll need to come up with a strategy for migrating to the
> 'correct' command on the client side, given that older versions of
> dovecot won't accept it.
> I'll probably make the Evolution client code start off by trying the
> correct command, and then retry with the bogus '1:*' if that fails.

Can't you simply send 1:<last uid you've seen>? Or if you want flags for
messages you haven't even seen yet, 1:4294967295 should work too.

Reply via email to