2010/12/16 Jose Celestino <j...@co.sapo.pt>: > On Qui, 2010-12-16 at 12:56 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >> * Cor Bosman <c...@xs4all.nl>: > >> > I saw someone also posted a patch to the LKML. >> >> I guess I missed that one >> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/15/470
Timo, if we apply the above kernel patch, do we still need to patch dovecot or is it just an either-or thing? I'm guessing the reason I saw so many less context switches when using a client_limit of more than one due to having more connections per process == less children to wake up.
