On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:06 AM, flylordis flylordis <[email protected]> wrote: > Remy Zandwijk remy at luckyhands.nl wrote: > >>On 28.07.2011 01:15 , flylordis flylordis wrote: >>> Hello, >>> I am having a problem with the lmtp delivery of mail addressed to >>> multiple recipients. The first recipient receives the mail correctly >>> but the next recipients do not. ltmp apparently tries to create a >>> link from the subsequent recipients' mail store to the first recipient >>> mail store and fails. This returns 451 smtp codes to the sender which >>> then resends at some later time. Please see below for users jerry, >>> steve, and mary. The message to jerry gets written but not steve or >>> mary: >>> >>Are you using Postfix? What are the Postfix values of: >> >>transport_destination_concurrency_limit >>transport_destination_recipient_limit >> >> >>-Remy > > We are using sendmail on a couple of MX boxes that are communicating > directly with dovecot/lmtp on port 24. Again from the logs in my > first message the troubling entries are those that look like this: > > Jul 27 11:24:42 testmailserver dovecot: lmtp(12412, steve): Error: > link(/spool/mail/j/jerry/mail/INBOX/u.20423, > /spool/mail/s/steve/mail/INBOX/.temp.1311791081.P12412Q2M989550.testmailserver.) > failed: Permission denied > Jul 27 11:24:42 testmailserver dovecot: lmtp(12412, steve): > +1IXBeVXME58MAAARoVNxQ: msgid=<201107271824.p6RIOPa5020900 at > backup.>: save failed to INBOX: Internal error occurred. Refer to > server log for more information. [2011-07-27 11:24:41] > > lmtp seems to be attempting to write a link from one user's mail store > to another user's mail store. This only happens on recipients that > are not first on the recipient list. > > Best regards, > -Boris > > PS - Apologies to the list if this mail produces an out of thread > message as I posted the original message as a non-member (needing > moderator approval) and I am now a member. >
Hmm, I am wondering if this particular issue is involved: http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot-cvs/2010-May/017083.html Could anyone familiar with it please confirm or not? Best regards, Boris
