On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:08 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote: > Am 22.12.2011 00:49, schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg: > > 2011/12/22 Jim Knuth <[email protected]>: > >> am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg > >> > >> <[email protected]>: > >> > >> > >>>> Indeed; very many of us use Debian stable. Which kernel did you install > >>>> that is 2.0.16-friendly, and was this from Debian stable's updates > >>>> system? > >>>> > >>>> regards, Ron > >>> > >>> > >>> Debian for production servers??? That sounds dangerous. > >> > >> > >> sorry, but that`s absolutely bulls*it. *lol* > >> Where have you read then THIS? > > > > My own experience! > > > > Reasons against Debian: > > > > - No LSB certification (Linux Standard Base) > > - No hardware certification (IBM, Dell, HP ...) > > - Incompatible with some Broadcom NICs > > - Full of bugs > > - Free Kernel (non-free firmware removed... lol) > > - Obsolete kernel (incompatible with new hardware) > > - Obsolete packages > > - Only one year support for oldstable *lol* > > - Long delay for security updates > > > > -- > > Chris > > dont feed trolls >
Why is it when someone disagrees with someone's opinion they are labelled a troll, maybe because it hits a raw nerve huh? I dunno, and frankly don't care, but you have no right to do so just because you don't agree with Christophers statements.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
