Am 20.05.2012 19:00, schrieb Jerry: > What I meant was that "SQLite" would have to be installed on the > system. As far as I know, it is not; although MySQL is. I just talked > to my friend and he told me the problem was that the owner of the > company was/is afraid of damaging the databases presently in use. We > are going to assure him that no such thing will happen and hopefully put > his mind at ease.
why in the world should existing databases get damaged by another one? it is the main job of a db-server to offer as many databases/users/tables as needed and since if you are using MyISAM each database have it's own folder which you can even copy offline to any other server how should any damage be technically possible only because one more db? stats of one of our mysql-servers: * databases: 195 * tables: 4652 * records: 329049
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
