On 07/12/2012 12:29 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> is spam, but provide proper SMTP response. >> >> I personally do not recommend rejecting cases (very) close to spam/ham >> border in SMTP session > well i have very very low amount of misses > > but consider generating meaningful SMTP response like "if you are not > spammer call us, so we will fix it" 1) I personally do not like using ONLY binary choice [accept/reject (in SMTP session)]. I personally do prefer something for (small) range in between. 2) IMHO senders' opinions are much less relevant than recipients' opinions for postmaster of receiving server. [received e.g. via antispam plug-in of dovecot (moving messages in/out spambox folder]
- Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old s... Voytek Eymont
- Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of o... Charles Marcus
- Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of o... Voytek Eymont
- Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of o... Charles Marcus
- Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of o... Robert Schetterer
- Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old spam from +spam Maildir... Wojciech Puchar
- Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old spam from +spam Maildir... Andrzej A. Filip
- Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old spam from +spam Ma... Wojciech Puchar
- Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old spam from +spa... Andrzej A. Filip
- Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old spam from ... Wojciech Puchar
- Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old spam f... Andrzej A. Filip
- Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old spam from +spam Maildir... Joseph Tam
