At 4PM +0100 on 6/11/12 you (Stephan Bosch) wrote: > Op 11/6/2012 1:43 PM, Ben Morrow schreef: > > You want 'ereject', RFC 5429, but Pigeonhole currently only implements > > it as a synonym for reject. I'm not sure if this is within-spec or not: > > this paragraph > > > > The "ereject" action MUST NOT be available in environments that do > > not support protocol-level rejection, e.g., an MUA, and MUST be > > available in all other environments that support the "reject" > > action. > > > > makes me think that perhaps it's not; in any case, Dovecot's > > implementation won't do what you want. > > That feature is under development, and such features aren't compiled > unless people add `--with-unfinished-features' to their configure line. > So, don't worry, Pigeonhole does not normally violate the specification > in this regard.
Oh, cool, I missed that on my quick look through the source. Ben
