Noel Butler skrev den 2013-01-07 03:18:
Nope, all severs are slackware (and I dont have any problem which was
my
point in earlier thread, no reason why 1.2.17 can't still be suitable
for years to come) used to have some gentoo as well, but phased them
out
to keep everything uniform, and desktops are almost now all opensuse,
and once ubuntu stop supporting 10.04 those couple will be converted
to
opensuse as well (and thats only "then" because I'm too lazy to do it
"now" LOL)
:)
i just prefer opensource that is not precompiled as server platform,
mostly what is precompiled needs to be recompiled to support what i need
anyway, thats why i use gentoo/funtoo/freebsd :=)
and yes i found that opensuse is more nice one to keep as desktop os
aswell
I build from sources all key daemon software anyway, package
maintainers
can only account for so many configurations. Its not so critical with
dovecot now since v2, because, regrettably, Timo removed a lot of
fine
tune config options that allowed us to only build in what we wanted,
now, tuff, most the auth methods and stuff must be built even if we
dont
want them.
shit happens, he does not like opensource then ?, what was a major show
stopper for me was the splited config that needs whole new layout to
keep the old 1.x style config to work in 2.x, and gentoo infra just
ignored my call for help geting it back as long Timo keeps wiki for 1.x
hope it makes sense to other why
But if we absolutely must need a new feature that is in 2.1.x and we
can
no longer live without it, then and only then will I consider moving
to
it, otherwise, I'm happy to sit on 1.2 until I consider 2.1 mature
and
stable enough.
same here, but i try to see how 2.x works here if i get succed with it
i properly change to dovecot 2.1 when i build a new server, but change
the stable one, no thanks
