Am 26.02.2013 21:18, schrieb Charles Marcus:
> On 2013-02-26 3:09 PM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Am 26.02.2013 21:05, schrieb Charles Marcus:
>>> Why does it say 'TLS', when it technically (there is a difference after 
>>> all) should say 'SSL'?
>>> Not a big deal, but it is just something I've been meaning to ask
>> because it is practically the same?
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security
> 
> Practically - but not *exactly*, hence my use of the word 'technically'...
> Maybe I'm picking nits, but that doesn't change the fact that they are *not* 
> exactly the same

ah so enlighten us about the big difference you see
and what in SSL is not "transport layer security"

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa380515%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
TLS is a standard closely related to SSL 3.0, and is sometimes referred to as 
"SSL 3.1"

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to