On 28/2/2013 11:43 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 28/2/2013 9:08 πμ, Michael Grimm wrote:
Thus, whoever is interested in a cheap man's fail-over mail cluster
with geographically distributed servers and moderate load, I would
encourage to consider and test replicator/dsync v2.2, now.
On 27/2/2013 11:10 μμ, Timo Sirainen wrote:
dsync was meant exactly for that kind of replication. For a
relatively few number of users this should work well
Thank you Timo and Alexei for your encouraging info. This is exactly
what I was thinking about. We have about 250 mailboxes (most of which
are using POP3) with about 4000 outgoing / 8000 incoming mail messages
per day. Normal traffic is under 5 mails (total in/out) per minute.
IMHO, this sounds like a good case for dsync.
Now, where can I find directions on how to set up dsync/dovecot to
work as explained, i.e. with real-time replication (for v2.2)?
Thanks again,
Nick
Hmm, I feel I have to re-send, to correctly attribute the former text to
Michael Grimm (rather than to Цветков Алексей). [Corrected above.]
In any case, please provide some link with info on how to set this up
correctly for continuous real-time dsync.
I am using ldap-hosted accounts and Maildir. Dovecot runs on CentOS 6.3.
It seems to me that the mirroring examples at:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Dsync refer to a one-time operation,
rather than to a continuous/real-time function.
Sincerely,
Nick
