On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 10:29 +0000, Damien Churchill wrote: > I've been messing about with this and I think a similar configuration > format to the sql dict driver would be handy, although I imagine the > same could also be achieved with just lots of uri arguments. Mongo > isn't really a key/value store so you'd want to be able to specify > fields within the document to query upon/fetch. > > I'm still getting to grips with the architecture of things so not > entirely sure what the best course of action would be here. If using > the map style config would be desirable then creating some shared > parser that sql and mongodb can use would be good.
I've been planning on having one generic dict sql-like configuration for all dict backends, so you could map different dict paths to different backends. So the idea is good, but probably quite a lot of work.
