On 05.05.2013 02:56, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
May 4 20:16:30 volanges dovecot: imap(jdoe): Error: Cached message size
smaller than expected (2000 < 8063)
May 4 20:16:30 volanges dovecot: imap(jdoe): Error: Corrupted index
cache file /mail/indexes/jdoe/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.cache: Broken
physical size for mail UID 141869
May 4 20:19:48 volanges dovecot: imap(jdoe): Error: Cached message size
smaller than expected (9711 < 16248)
May 4 20:19:48 volanges dovecot: imap(jdoe): Error: Corrupted index
cache file /mail/indexes/jdoe/mail/.imap/Arxiv/dovecot.index.cache:
Broken physical size for mail UID 4383
May 4 21:14:35 volanges dovecot: imap(jdoe): Error: Cached message size
smaller than expected (1878 < 8066)
May 4 21:14:35 volanges dovecot: imap(jdoe): Error: Corrupted index
cache file /mail/indexes/jdoe/mail/.imap/CNRS/dovecot.index.cache:
Broken physical size for mail UID 290
May 4 21:15:17 volanges dovecot: imap(jdoe): Error: Cached message size
smaller than expected (17285 < 24440)
May 4 21:15:17 volanges dovecot: imap(jdoe): Error: Corrupted index
cache file /mail/indexes/jdoe/mail/.imap/Commandes/dovecot.index.cache:
Broken physical size for mail UID 680
Does that ring a bell? I am tempted to downgrade to 2.1.13. Does it
makes sense? Is it safe to do so?
This bug has been fixed with dovecot 2.1.14.
Please check:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/0b0399f1b6aa
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-February/088313.html
Best regards,
Morten
