Am 14.10.2014 um 11:02 schrieb Professa Dementia:
On 10/14/2014 1:28 AM, Jorge Bastos wrote:Also the [Dovecot] on the subject would be handy.The list used to do this. I agree with you, and the matter was debated, but the list is not a democracy and Timo, as the owner, changed the list unilaterally. The problem is that changing the subject conflicts with DKIM. DKIM is a broken standard for several reasons; it does not have allowances for mailing lists to add their name to the subject - a very common and useful practice - and these days spam filters do a far superior job than DKIM, making it too little, too late
nonsense because that spamfilters use DKIM and SPF *too* for their scoring cat maillog | grep "spamd: result" | grep DKIM | wc -l 12782 /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000/updates_spamassassin_org score USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST -100.000 score USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL -7.500 score DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 score DKIM_VALID -0.1 score DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 score DKIM_VERIFIED 0 score DKIM_POLICY_SIGNALL 0 score DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME 0 score DKIM_POLICY_TESTING 0 score DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_LOW 0.001 score DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED 0.001 score DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_HIGH 0.001 score DKIM_ADSP_ALL 0 1.1 0 0.8 score DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD 0 1.8 0 1.8 score DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN 0 0.8 0 0.9 score DKIMDOMAIN_IN_DWL 0 -3.5 0 -3.5 score DKIMDOMAIN_IN_DWL_UNKNOWN 0 -0.01 0 -0.01
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
