Dear Thomas, You do seem to have some computing power. I think that does help. Thanks Kevin A.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Thomas Leuxner <t...@leuxner.net> wrote: > * Peter Hodur <peteho...@gmail.com> 2015.01.29 05:25: > > > > With a current version of Dovecot a search is pretty fast _without_ > using > > > external indexes. I have a view defined (virtual plugin) with around > 22.000 > > > messages in it, and searching the full view only takes 2.5 seconds: > > > > > > > > hmmm, could you please tell me more about your setup? What storage format > > do you use? Maildir or? What is the cumulative size of your messages? > > > Although the question was not formatted/quoted correctly I guess it is > more towards myself as it explicitely speaks of a non-FTS setup: > > $ dmesg | grep smpboot > [ 0.000000] smpboot: Allowing 64 CPUs, 56 hotplug CPUs > [ 0.148600] smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v3 @ 3.30GHz > (fam: 06, model: 3c, stepping: 03) > [ 0.300030] smpboot: Total of 8 processors activated (52677.72 BogoMIPS) > > The volume providing the mail root is using ext4 on an MD mirror (with > CRYPT and LVM overhead): > > > $ lsblk > [...] > └─sda3 8:3 0 ... 0 part > └─md2 9:2 0 ... 0 raid1 > └─crypt1 (dm-0) 253:0 0 ... 0 crypt > └─vg0-vmail (dm-11) 253:11 0 ... 0 lvm /var/vmail > > $ doveconf -n | head -3 > # 2.2.15 (7557234ac0f4): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > # Pigeonhole version 0.4.6 > # OS: Linux 3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 7.8 > > I'm using unspectacular 7,200rpm SATA drives and mdbox. >