On 30.06.2016 13:45, Dave wrote: > > A very minor patch to support redis AUTH (for all that's worth) > using an extra password= field. I'm not sure if this will be of any > value to anyone here. We're testing it in development and "it works > for us" but it's yet to be used in anger. > > Sorry if I'm going about this the wrong way, I tried emailing this > directly but heard nothing back; so I'm reposting to the list as I'm > honestly not sure what established protocol is regarding code > contribution. >
Hi! Your patch is under consideration. Thank you for your contribution. --- Aki Tuomi Dovecot oy
