Quoting Daniel Miller <[email protected]>:
I've been re-thinking my backup strategy - I wanted to see what
input others have. At this time - I'm using sdbox as the primary
storage format and running on a single server.
Previously, all my backups were simple filesystem backups. Either
inotify-based or cron-based. The whole mail folder structure would
then be copied to a remote storage site. I've changed services - I
now use OpenDrive for the remote storage and can access the remote
drive as a mounted folder via WebDAV. I also now use a cron-based
series of restic jobs for the backup processing.
Because I have some large folders - both personal & business letters
going back quite some time as well as mailing list archives - some
mail folders can be quite sizable. Now I'm wondering, between
sdbox's support for alternate locations and the ability to use
different storage formats via namespaces - perhaps I should setup
archive folders that are stored differently to improve backup
performance. Maybe maildir or even mbox for the archive folders - I
create one per year?
Any comments? Experiences?
-- Daniel
IMHO, Maildir ontop of zfs. But anything ontop of zfs will solve it.
zfs Snapshot for local 'backups', zfs send to remote server for real backup.
Rick
