> On 4 Sep 2018, at 19.32, Rick Romero <r...@havokmon.com> wrote: >> No it does not. This is different thing. This is about managing duplicates >> on multiple syncs. >> Imapsync seems to keep track of UID -> MAIL mapping for server A and UID -> >> MAIL mapping for server B so that on multiple runs it does not sync the same >> messages again. However it does not use the same UID -> MAIL for server B as >> is originally on server A. And that is the problem. > That's not what you said, you said there was a client sync issue. That's > definitely an issue (especially if you run Mac Mail). > > Ignoring duplicates on multiples runs is a non-issue, even with the 2011 > version. Recording UIDs is not necessary for that. >
Nope. I said that with imapsync there is no way to preserve the same UID for a mail on the destination. Data is lost. If the UID -> MAIL pairs are not kept then client caches need to be invalidated and redownloaded. Sami
