Hi Francis,
My Solr instance is on 1GB but using less than 512MB. You might need to
adjust Java VM memory usage but it's possible. I have only my own email
but also 10-15 years history and search results including headers and
body are instant.
Things are on SSD but still I think the search storage fits into memory.
Philon
Am 04.02.2020 11:46, schrieb Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay:
Hi Philon,
Thanks a lot for your thoughts!
Can I ask you if using Solr improved things for you? I have a mailbox
with 15 years of e-mail and searching things take a long time.
On 04.02.2020 09:39, Philon wrote:
Hi Francis,
next to fts-solr there was fts-lucene. But that Lucene there seems
heavily outdated why the Dovecot docs also suggest using Solr.
Elasticsearch probably is similar to Solr but the later is maintained
by Dovecot team.
I started with downloading the Solr binary distribution to Debian with
JRE preinstalled and things were running like after 10 min. Yes it’s a
bit more complicated to find the schema and edit things like header
size (in tips section). It’s running quite nicely since then and has
zero maintenance.
I will try again - I kept getting some weird errors, so I don't know
if that's why I wasn't seing much of improvement.
As FTS indexes are separate in external Solr instance I’d guess that
it won’t interfere with dsync. What I don’t know is if dsync’ing would
trigger indexing. This brings me to wonder how one could actually
replicate the Solr instance!?
Good question. But what I thought about doing was to install FTS on my
backup instance, and if things go fine, then I install an FTS instance
on my production server - that is, if one doesn't interfere with the
other.
I will give Solr another shot - my worries are mostly if Solr is
supported on ARM (my prod instance is running on ARM) - I know
Elasticsearch has an ARM build.
Ii thought about the Xapian engine, but since it requires dovecot 2.3,
I will have to wait.
Best,
Francis
Philon
On 31 Jan 2020, at 17:24, Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi there,
I got successfully to replicate my mail server to another dovecot
install using dsync, mainly for redundancy, and it works great.
I want to try to install fts, as some of the mailboxes have tens of
thousands of messages, and it takes minutes to get some results when
searching via IMAP on a Roundcube interface.
I want to experiment with fts-solr first, and firstly on my redundant
server, ie., not on my main dovecot install. Is it ok to do this? I
ask because I am afraid of how this whole reindexing on the redundant
install will affect the production server.
Also, any tips on something else than fts-solr? I tried it once, but
it was so hard to get it right, so many configurations, java, etc.,
that I'd rather try something else. I also could try fts-elastic or
something like that, but, again, having to maintain an elasticsearch
install might use more resources than I think is worth. Any thoughts
on that?
Best,
--
Francis
