Thanks for the update, we'll check it out and see if there is something to do.
Aki > On 10/01/2021 23:34 [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Update: > > I was finally able to build 2.3.13 on centos 8 (8.3). I managed this by going > back to the qmailtoaster spec file, removing a few things no longer relevant > (vpopmail) and disabling all the tests. Most tests were still running but > there were also many that did not. The good news is the resulting executable > in the RPM no longer complains about not being able to find libdovecot.so > (http://libdovecot.so). i've done some basic testing on imap and everything > appears to be working. > > Someone who maintains the tests and rpm build should really have a look. > Doing a build on a fresh centos 8 machine, as I was able to with the > qmailtoaster source rpm, should really be much simpler. My impression is the > current spec file may have edits that were eroneously committed? > > Steve > > Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE device > > ------ Original message------ > From:[email protected] > Date:Sat, Jan 9, 2021 3:42 PM > To:[email protected]; > Cc: > Subject:status of test code > > Hi, > > I'm continuing to try to build 2.3.13 with a source RPM. > > At this point I've taken the source zip file and I'm working with the > previously working qmailtoaster SPEC file and RPM build process. > > The toaster SPEC file runs the built-in dovecot tests after build... 2.3.11 > would make it through > all the tests with a few minor exceptions. > > 2.3.13 seems no longer able to run the test is lib-ssl-iostream or lib-lua > (and perhaps others, but that's as far as I've gotten). > > I can selectively disable the tests to make progress, but it raises the > question of what the plans are for the built-in tests. > > Also, I continue to not be able to find where all the testing is turned > on/off at once? I'm sure it will be obvious when someone tells me but > please tell me, because I'm pulling my hair out. > > Steve > >
