2.3 director should work with 2.4 proxy and backend.
Aki
On 21/06/2023 00:40 EEST Steven Varco <dovecot....@bbs.varco.ch> wrote:Sad, had planed to migrate my dovecot cluster (2x director 2x IMAP from 2.2.36 (CentOS 7) to 2.4 (AlmaLinux 9, when 2.4 is released).So, does anyone already built a STABLE(!) alternative for director?@Aki: Is dovecot IMAP 2.4 expected to still work with dovecot director 2.2 (or 2.3)?In this case I may just upgrade the IMAP Servers and leave the director/loadbalancer servers for some time.In general: Is the upgrade from 2.2 to 2.3 or 2.4. smooth or are there a lot of breaking changes and the upgrade would have to be planend thoroughly?thanks,StevenAm 01.06.2023 um 12:32 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot@dovecot.org>:On 01/06/2023 12:16 EEST Marc <m...@f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote:On 01/06/2023 11:37 EEST Marc <m...@f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote:Is there a specific reason why there are (still) no el9 packages?Because 2.3 still does not support RHEL9. It will be added for 2.4.Oh shit, I did not expect there was such a huge dependency on the os for dovecot. I have already removed some old test el8 stuff and upgrading from el7 to el9. So nothing with el8. Is it really a big problem to get dovecot 2.3 to work on el9? I have the impression the differences between el8 and el9 are not so significant. For now the srpms I tried from el8 seem ok to compile on el9.There are some stuff that we rather fix for 2.4 than 2.3. I am aware of a patch for TLS code in Dovecot that redhat uses.This 2.4 will have this director removed not?Yes.Aki_______________________________________________dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.orgTo unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org_______________________________________________dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.orgTo unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
_______________________________________________ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
