On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 at 20:40, Michael Slusarz via dovecot
<dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
>
> > On 07/18/2023 9:00 AM MDT Gerald Galster <list+dove...@gcore.biz> wrote:
> >
> > While I understand it takes effort to maintain the replication plugin, this 
> > is especially problematic for small active/active high-availability 
> > deployments.
>
> To clarify: replication absolutely does not provide "active/active".  
> Replication was meant to copy data to a standby server, but you can't have 
> concurrent mailbox access.  This is why directors existed.
>
>
> > I guess there are lots of servers that use replication for just 50 or 100 
> > mailboxes. Cloudstorage (like S3) would be overkill for these.
> >
> > Do you provide dovecot pro subscriptions for such small deployments?
>
> A 50-100 mailbox user server will run Dovecot CE just fine.  Pro would be 
> overkill.
>
> All current Dovecot development assumes that storage is decoupled from the 
> system.  Shared (as in network available) storage is what you need if you 
> want high availability, whether in Pro or CE.

That seems like an extraordinary callous and short-sighted decision,
but nevertheless does give some technical weight to your earlier
statement.

Regards

Simon
_______________________________________________
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org

Reply via email to