On January 26, 2026 22:55:40 Lefteris Tsintjelis via dovecot
<[email protected]> wrote:
> There are 2 issues if anyone considers using external and not local RBLs:
>
> 1) Speed/connectivity depending on where you are. The total response of all
> RBLs used should be under 10ms if possible
> 2) FPs. You don’t control what is on anyone’s list so you may be forced to
> whitelist and that makes things more complex.
>
> A well trained local list would be much faster, way more reliable with no
> packet loss, and extremely more accurate with close to 0 FPs. My local RBL
> gets at least 95% hits with 0 FPs and of course it is way faster and reliable
> for me as I control it.
How do you populate it?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
_______________________________________________
dovecot mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
