you guys realize that final versions of Maven have been using Doxia
for quite some time now and the fact that it's being called alpha as
an excuse to make more API changes, which will affect the future
development of maven, instead of evolving the API in a backwards
compatible way, it's not a good idea at all
my 0.02
On 10/21/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lukas has continued work on trunk for beta-1 which includes changes to
> the api. These changes will *not* be in the doxia release that I plan do
> shortly. This release, dubbed alpha-10, is a bug-fix release for
> alpha-9. Alpha-9 has some bugs that makes it unusable for the site- and
> project-info-reports-plugin.
>
> So the plan is to do a quick alpha-10 of doxia followed by releases of
> site-plugin and project-info-reports-plugin.
>
> Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> > why still alpha?
> >
> > On 10/20/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> As you might have seen from the commit messages, I have created branches
> >> in doxia and doxia-sitetools for future alpha releases. The branches
> >> were created from 1.0-alpha-9. On the branches the following stuff has
> >> been merged in from trunk:
> >>
> >> - DOXIA-156
> >> - DOXIA-161
> >> - The dependency cleanup in the poms
> >>
> >> Do we need anything else?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dennis Lundberg
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dennis Lundberg
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
