I attached a patch to DOXIA-169. It's still unassigned, so go ahead and apply it.
vmassol wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > On Oct 24, 2007, at 7:08 PM, Dave Syer wrote: > >> >> Is anyone actively involved in developing the Confluence module >> right now? >> Several issues have been raised this week (some by me), but no-one >> seems to >> be reviewing them, or working on them. Some are really trivial. > > I guess the answer is nobody is currently active on it and that we're > all responsible for working on it and fixing outstanding issues... > > If you know how to fix some issues patches would be welcome. I'm also > interested in fixing it and I can apply patches. > > For me the general question is whether we should continue using a > hand-written confluence parser or rather switch to a javacc based one > as the wikimodel project is doing. > > -Vincent > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Confluence-module-outstanding-issues...-tf4685061.html#a13394530 Sent from the Doxia - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
