Hi Brett, I think we could have the following: Doxia 1.0 should be for Maven 2.0.x Doxia 1.1 should be for Maven 2.1.x/3.x with a fix for MNG-3402
Cheers, Vincent 2008/12/18 Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>: > I have a question about this... > > Does this mean that MNG-3402 should be rescheduled for 2.1.0 now, instead of > 2.0.11? > > I have updated the wiki - and have pushed the upgrade to beta-1 out to > 2.1.0-M3 so that we can push out another milestone in the mean time. > > Cheers, > Brett > > 2008/12/16 Vincent Siveton <vincent.sive...@gmail.com> > Hi Dennis, > > I renamed branches, did an external on the branches, updated some poms. > I leave you Jira and the 1.0 release. > > Cheers, > > Vincent > > 2008/12/14 Vincent Siveton <vincent.sive...@gmail.com>: >> Hi Dennis, >> >>> 2. Rename >>> >>> http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0-alpha-x/ >>> to >>> >>> http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0.x/ >> >> I didn't remember this branch... Thanks to refresh my memory :) >> >> So, I suggest also to create an external on these branches. I propose: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/1.0-x with >> doxia >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia/branches/doxia-1.0.x/ >> doxia-sitetools >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-1.0.x/ >> >> Also, think to update the scm tag in the poms :) >> >>>> - apply new versioning in pom >>> >>> Yes, either before the release or during release:prepare, for both the >>> branch and trunk. >> >> Before is better IMHO >> >>>> What else? >>> >>> For the 1.0 release I think that covers it. >>> >>> Shall we divide up the work between us Vincent? >>> If I do the 1.0 release can you do the 1.1 release? >> >> Sounds good for me. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Vincent >> > > > > -- > Brett Porter > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >
