Dominic, I can reproduce it with python code, the small test I ran before used C code and didn't show the line numbers, so we have a second problem here. We have to dive into these problems, please submit bug reports for it.
Note: you use as snippet identification transducer setup which is at the moment fully correct, but please use transducer_setup as the definition of the snippet command might slightly change in a future version (adding some extra arguments, which might require a small inconsistency). Albert On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Dominic Amann <[email protected]> wrote: > Here is the Doxygen comment that produces the snippet: > > # To demonstrate the API, take a look at the transducer_setup method of > # the app class (in pyscope_any.py) below: > # > # \snippet this transducer setup > # > # multiMode must be set to 4 to support multiple transducers (0 for > legacy mode). > > > Here is the snippet as produced (seen in my browser). > > ==== > > To demonstrate the API, take a look at the transducer_setup method of the > app class (in pyscope_any.py) below: > 1 def transducer_setup(self): > 2 tc1 = TraceCollector() > 3 tc1.on_init() > 4 settings = TraceCollectorPy.SGprSettings() > 5 settings.points_per_trace = PPT > 6 # This may need shifting for different frequencies > 7 settings.window_timeshift_ps = -42000 > 8 settings.multiMode = 4 > 9 # edit tuples in following call for different transducer arrangements > 10 tc1.prepare_transducers(0, 1, settings, [(1, 1, 1), (2, 2, 1)]) > 11 # put RX scopes in right slots > 12 tc1.add_scope(2) > 13 # add our new trace-collector to list > 14 self._trace_collectors.append(tc1) > > multiMode must be set to 4 to support multiple transducers (0 for legacy > mode). > > ==== > > Ideally, the line numbers would be 325..338 (the actual line numbers > within the code). > > > > On 31 August 2016 at 11:56, Albert <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dominic, >> >> There are at the moment, as far as I know, no possibilities to do this, >> best is to file a bug report for an enhancement at bugzilla (see: >> http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/manual/trouble.html#bug_reports). >> Which version of doxygen ar you using and which output format? >> Where do you see the line numbers? >> >> Albert >> >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Dominic Amann <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Is there a way to number the code snippet lines with their absolute >>> (file based) line numbers? I am including the snippet to show other >>> developers where to look in the code to modify certain values, and the "1" >>> based line numbers are not helpful. >>> >>> If there is no way to do this, then I would like to request this as a >>> feature. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> People are generally better persuaded by the reasons which they have >>> themselves discovered than by those which have come into the mind of others >>> - Blaise Pascal. >>> >>> Dominic Amann >>> M 416-270-4587 >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> ------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Doxygen-develop mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-develop >>> >>> >> > > > -- > > > > People are generally better persuaded by the reasons which they have > themselves discovered than by those which have come into the mind of others > - Blaise Pascal. > > Dominic Amann > M 416-270-4587 >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Doxygen-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-develop
