Here is an exchange of mails I had on the above problem, which did not
unfortunately, resolve it:
Hi Arthur
I tried removing the outer class specification, but unfortunately that did
not work, as you thought.
Well, that's not quite true - bizarrely it worked for a method with a return
type of void...but not for the other methods, don't ask me why...
Diarmuid
Hi Diarmuid;
Nope. Don't think that there is anything wrong with the statement and the
return argument (seems to) have no relevancy. Can't say that I've helped
much but here is a copydoc from my code. Seems about the same as yours
except that I'm not referencing an inner class. I suppose that you might
want to remove the outer class specification and see if that improves
things, but I don't think that that should work.
/** @copydoc SlipCellBase::remove() */
art
Hi Arthur,
Thanks for your reply.
No, I did not mean class testClassX : innerClassX.
The example I gave is direct from the code.
testClassX is not a namespace, it is a class. It is declared in a .h file.
The code I supplied is from the corresponding .cpp file.
Diarmuid
Did you mean "class testClassX : innerClassX {"? Where is the namespace
testClassX defined?
art
--
View this message in context:
http://doxygen.10944.n7.nabble.com/copydoc-warning-target-of-copydoc-command-not-found-tp6345p6352.html
Sent from the Doxygen - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that
developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white
paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep
Android apps secure.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Doxygen-users mailing list
Doxygen-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
