Hi.
I'm documenting some structures that looks like this :
/*! Dataset for status data. */
typedef struct __attribute__ ((__packed__)) {
UINT16 outputs; /*!< Board outputs. */
UINT32 inputs; /*!< Board inputs. */
UINT16 status; /*!< Board status. */
UINT16 errors; /*!< Internal errors (bits field). */
} dataset_status;
And here is the error message from doxygen :
pdtask.c:65: warning: Member dataset_status (variable) of group iptstr is
not documented.
[...]
pdtask.c:74: warning: return type of member __attribute__ is not documented
How could I document such a structure so that not only there is
no error message from doxygen, but also so that the produced
documentation is correct.
Actually that produces something like, for the file in question :
[...]
Functions
struct __attribute__ ((__packed__))
[...other functions...]
I could have a named structure, however no only I prefer the
compactness of this kind of defintion, but also, I'm not sure
it wouldn't produce the same result...
T.
--
| A: Yes.
| >Q: Are you sure?
| >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Doxygen-users mailing list
Doxygen-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
