I mean, it is possible to do that in PHP, but I want to reflect this in the documentation. For example, I have written a DateTime class and it can be constructed without a parameter to get "now", with an integer (meaning unix timestamp), three integers denoting year, month and day, and so on.
I would like the documentation to treat them as if they were different constructors, instead of one without parameters (it calls func_get_args() to read its parameters) that handles all the possibilities. I tried: /// @fn clsDateTime::__construct() /// Construct a clsDateTime object representing now. /// @fn clsDateTime::__construct($mixTimeStamp) /// Construct a clsDateTime object representing the given timestamp. /// If the timestamp is numeric, it is treated as a unix timestamp, with decimal seconds if it is a float.\n /// If it is a string, it is parsed as a delimited set of the values for year, month, day, hour, minute and second, /// unless the string is one of the special values "now", "today", or "tomorrow".\n /// If it is a clsDateTime object, the new object is a copy. /// @fn clsDateTime::__construct($intYear, $intMonth, $intDay) /// @param integer $intYear The year as a number /// @param integer $intMonth The month as a number /// @param integer $intDay The day of the month as a number. /// Construct a clsDateTime object representing the given date. But all this does is to combine all the above sections into one. It is possible to have Doxygen create overloaded documentation for a language that does not really support overloading, just for clarity? Best regards, Willem Bogaerts ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Doxygen-users mailing list Doxygen-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
