Monique,

Did you have a look at the possibilities of the doxygen layout file?
(doxygen -l and the LAYOUT_FILE setting in the Doxyfile)

Albert

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Monique Semp <monique.s...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

> (Using Doxygen 1.8.10)
>
> Well, setting the REPEAT_BRIEF option to NO took care of the earlier
> problem (below), but now I find the same issue with .page files.
>
> The \brief description nicely appears in the table/list in the Related
> Pages, but unfortunately it also appears in the page itself.
>
> So apparently the REPEAT_BRIEF setting does not apply to documentation for
> \page content.
>
> Is this as intended, a bug, something that is configurable, or maybe just
> something that hasn’t come up yet?
>
> Thanks for any suggestions,
> -Monique
>
>
> *From:* Monique Semp <monique.s...@earthlink.net>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 15, 2015 5:55 PM
> *To:* doxygen-users <doxygen-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *Subject:* any way to suppress - prepending \brief to \details in class &
> file members ?
>
> Hello, Doxygen users,
>
> I’m wondering if there’s any way to suppress the standard behavior of the
> \brief and \details commands for class & file members? As it says in the
> documentation,
> https://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/manual/commands.html#cmdbrief, the
> \brief is prepended to the \details.
>
> But I really, really wish that when there is a \details command, only it
> would appear in the output (without the prepended \brief content).
>
> <snip>
>
> Thanks for any ideas,
> -Monique
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Doxygen-users mailing list
> Doxygen-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Doxygen-users mailing list
Doxygen-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users

Reply via email to