> However, my alternate approach would be provide extra groups for the common
> functions:
Yes, that’s what I ended up doing. But it’s still not so user friendly because
now users have to look at multiple groups to see all the functions for, say,
async client (async client, core (aync and sycn) client, shared (client and
server) async, and core (async and sync) shared (client and server)) instead of
being able to look at just one group. But I added all the others as @sa
references to help guide readers.
So this makes it even more important to include good example code to point
people to the relevant functions in a way that’s not dependent on the groups.
Thanks for the confirmation that it’s a reasonable approach,
-Monique
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Doxygen-users mailing list
Doxygen-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
