Hello,
Thanks for the reply.
I tried 1.8.11 on my mac and I get a Segmentation fault!
.
.
.
Reading
/Users/relliott/unison-sync/KIM/git/kim-api/fortran/include/kim_model_compute_arguments_module.f90...
Parsing file
/Users/relliott/unison-sync/KIM/git/kim-api/fortran/include/kim_model_compute_arguments_module.f90...
/bin/sh: line 1: 54543 Segmentation fault: 11
/Users/relliott/doxygen/build/bin/doxygen
/Users/relliott/unison-sync/KIM/git/kim-api/build/docs/Doxyfile.docs
Anyway, then I set up a ubuntu VM and got it to work. Indeed, 1.8.11 on ubuntu
it seems I get the same output as RTD. I've also confirmed that 1.8.14 on
ubuntu produces the same output (without the interfaces documented) that I
previously obtained on my mac.
So, it seems that this is a regression in behavior from 1.8.11 to 1.8.14? How
should I go about figuring out when/where this happened and what to do about
it?
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Travis Everett wrote:
The copy on RTD indicates it was generated by doxygen 1.8.11, while the one
at openkim indicates 1.8.14; a good first step would be installing 1.8.11
and seeing if your output matches what's on RTD.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:08 PM Ryan S. Elliott <relli...@umn.edu> wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on the doxygen documentation for the kim-api project
(https://github.com/openkim/kim-api)
When I locally (on my mac) generate the doxygen docs I see problems with
the
fortran docs. In particular, there are a fair number of functions that
are not
automatically documented by the parser. Further, no generic interfaces are
documented.
However, the exact same git commit, when used to generate the doxygen docs
by
readthedocs documents all the functions and generates the generic interface
docs.
Here is a link to a readthedocs page showing the interfaces:
https://kim-api.readthedocs.io/en/latest/namespacekim__model__module.html
Here is a link to a similar page generated locally:
https://openkim.org/kim-api/docs-beta.3/namespacekim__model__module.html
In particular, also notice that in the locally generated docs the
"kim_model_is_routine_present" function is not documented!
I can't understand why these differences are occuring. Can anyone point
me in
the right direction?
Thanks,
Ryan Elliott
_______________________________________________
Doxygen-users mailing list
Doxygen-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
--
Ryan S. Elliott, Ph.D. and Professor
Aerospace Engineering & Mechanics, University of Minnesota
(612) 624-2376 (626-1558 fax)
https://z.umn.edu/relliott
download vCard <https://z.umn.edu/relliott_vcf>
----------
The distinction between past, present and future, is only an illusion, even
if a stubborn one.
Albert Einstein
----------
_______________________________________________
Doxygen-users mailing list
Doxygen-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
