Hi,

I totally agree with these two points! 

Although I forgot to explicitly request the attachment of the log files, the 
prior creation of a "good enough" testing plan (e.g. no step-by-step 
descriptions where a simpler scenario description suffices) indeed was. And as 
far as I know, Arsenij and Patrick created and followed such a plan.

However, at least we agree on the cornerstones of our Pre-Release Testing 
Procedure, so the re-writing of the according online description should be 
pretty painless.

Best Regards,
Franz

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Rossbach [mailto:srossb...@arcor.de] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 2:24 AM
To: Zieris, Franz
Cc: Arsenij Solovjev; dpp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [DPP-Devel] Results from TESTING

Yes I know this side is outdated but:

1. Give us a detailed description about what you have tested (if you state that 
all went well ... well ... I will blame you
if we will find defects in the "Akzeptanz Tests"

2. Log files ... I do no care where they will be uploaded but: I need the log 
files (best if you
start with an STF configuration so the Log Level is changed to Trace and  (not 
mentioned in this page) the
normal Eclipse Log file.

If you are testing the new release and do not provide the log files, your are 
testing for "free" ... a.k.a
you can rerun the whole process again until you provide the log files (no log 
files = no further analysis =
no release if something went wrong = you wasted hours of testing)

BR,
Stefan

-----------
Am 03.03.2013 23:10, schrieb Zieris, Franz:
Hi all,
 
these "rules" are . special. The last time when logfiles were uploaded to our 
internal (!) subversion server was on November 9th, 2009.
We'll discuss the content of this page after the next release. 
 
Arsenij and Patrick asked me personally about their actual tasks for testing 
and we talked face-to-face, because I knew this page was hopelessly outdated. 
 
Best Regards,
Franz

----------- 
From: Stefan Rossbach [mailto:srossb...@arcor.de] 
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 10:59 PM
To: Arsenij Solovjev
Cc: dpp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [DPP-Devel] Results from TESTING
 
Please follow our rules for testing: http://www.saros-project.org/Testing

You missed some things like:
  * Creating a Test Plan at the TestLink? home page 
    1. Go to "Test Plan Management" and click on the create button. Give a 
suitable name to the test plan. 
    2. Go to "Builds / Releases" and create a new build. We will probably only 
need a single build. 
    3. Go to "Add / Remove Test Cases". Choose the test cases you identified 
earlier. 

After the test: 
  1. All test participants store their log files in Subversion at 
https://svn.mi.fu-berlin.de/agse/sci/dpp/testing/logs/... and send an email to 
the list telling the others that they have done so 
    1. Alternatively if log files are small: Test participants send their logs 
to the list for the TM to upload to SVN. 
  2. All test participants search their log files for "FATAL", "ERROR" and 
"WARN". All of these should be collected into an email to be sent to the 
mailing-list. This should be done no later than 4pm on the test day. 
  3.  

-----------
Am 22.02.2013 17:16, schrieb Arsenij Solovjev:
Hallo dear devs,
There is one critical bug, no regressions and a few mildly irritating things.
The critical bug:
 
 a) Session-6 doesn't work: the host always gets his favorite color, no matter 
which
color it had in a previous session with the same contact.
A few mildly irritating things:
 
 a) The colors in the SUC change to the Session colors as soon as a session is 
started,
and revert to the old grey and cyan (which don't look pleasant anyway) when the 
session ends.
 b) We couldn't reproduce bug #3458952 on the old release.
Both the new and the old release displayed the same kind of behaviour:

  - A invited B and B accepted and chose a project location.
  - While B was modifying a shared file the whole time, a session negotiation 
is started with C
  - B got restricted to read-only, and couldn't regain permissions (The grant 
write-access context menu item, was greyed out on the host's side)
BR,
Arsenij and the test team
 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
DPP-Devel mailing list
DPP-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dpp-devel

Reply via email to