2014-10-26 22:53 GMT+01:00 Zieris, Franz <franz.zie...@fu-berlin.de>:
> This is only a partial answer; there are two sentences that look odd to > me. > > > > > This affects only the JRE launching the IDE. > > I’m not sure I get that point: It sounds like a mitigation – but the > IDE-launching JRE is all that matters for the argument in favor of Java 6. > > We want developers who are bound to Java 6 for whatever reason to be able > to use Saros. > Yes, it it a mitigation, but how many saros users are still using JRE 1.6? > I do not think that using different browsers for Eclipse and IntelliJ is > in the best interest of reducing duplicate code. > > > > I think you are mixing things up here: Using different browsers has only > little to do with code duplication. > > Having an HTML-based GUI reduces code duplication for the GUI. It does not > matter which browser renders the markup. > I should add that each browser requires different additonal code to interact with the IDE. The size of that code might be about the same as björn's widget (i think it would be bigger). >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ DPP-Devel mailing list DPP-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dpp-devel
